FISMA and FedRAMP are two cybersecurity frameworks that are widely used by government agencies in the United States. While both frameworks have similar goals of improving cybersecurity, they have different compliance requirements and approaches.
Understanding the differences between FISMA vs FedRAMP is important for government agencies to make informed decisions about which framework to use.
FISMA is a US law enacted in 2002 to improve cybersecurity of federal agencies’ information systems. The purpose is to ensure adequate safeguards to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access.
Federal agencies must comply with various security requirements, including the development of a risk management framework, implementation of security controls, and regular security assessments.
FISMA provides a standardized approach to cybersecurity for federal agencies, ensuring consistency in security practices, but compliance with it can be time-consuming and expensive. Despite its limitations, FISMA remains essential for federal agencies to ensure the security of their information systems.
FedRAMP is a US government-wide program established in 2011 to provide a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud-based services used by federal agencies. Cloud service providers must undergo a rigorous security assessment process and receive authorization before providing services to federal agencies.
The program aims to streamline the process of evaluating and approving cloud service providers’ security capabilities. It provides a consistent and transparent process for assessing and authorizing cloud services, helping to reduce cost and time.
With that said, FedRAMP has been criticized for being overly prescriptive and rigid, and it may not address the unique security needs of individual agencies. FedRAMP indisputably has its drawbacks. Despite these, however, it remains a valuable framework for federal agencies to adopt cloud-based services.
FISMA and FedRAMP are two important cybersecurity frameworks used by US federal agencies. Both frameworks aim to improve the security of federal agencies’ information systems, there are, however, some key differences between them.
FISMA was enacted in 2002 and requires federal agencies to develop and implement a risk management framework that includes security controls, periodic security assessments, and ongoing monitoring. FedRAMP, on the other hand, was established in 2011 and provides a standardized approach to the security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud-based services used by federal agencies.
One of the advantages of FISMA is that it provides a comprehensive framework for managing the security of federal agencies’ information systems. FISMA requires agencies to develop a risk management framework that includes security controls, which helps to ensure that all aspects of an agency’s information systems are secure.
On the other hand, FISMA can be time-consuming and expensive to implement, and it may not always address the unique security needs of individual agencies.
FedRAMP, by contrast, provides a standardized approach to assessing and authorizing cloud services. This helps to reduce the cost and time required for federal agencies to evaluate cloud service providers’ security capabilities.
FedRAMP also provides a consistent and transparent process for cloud service providers to obtain authorization. This can help to increase competition and reduce costs for federal agencies.
On the other hand, FedRAMP may not address all of the security needs of federal agencies, and it can be overly prescriptive and rigid.
When choosing between FISMA and FedRAMP, there are several factors that federal agencies should consider. These include the agency’s specific security needs, the cost and time required to implement each framework, and the availability of security resources and expertise.
Ultimately, the choice between FISMA and FedRAMP will depend on the specific needs of each federal agency, and it is important to carefully evaluate each framework before making a decision.
Compliance with FISMA and FedRAMP requires a strong cybersecurity posture and a commitment to ongoing risk management. Here are some best practices that federal agencies can follow to ensure successful compliance:
Conduct regular risk assessments: Regular risk assessments can help agencies identify and address potential vulnerabilities in their information systems.
Implement strong security controls: Implementing strong security controls, such as access controls, encryption, and multi-factor authentication, can help to protect sensitive information and prevent unauthorized access.
Develop and implement security policies and procedures: Developing and implementing security policies and procedures can help to ensure that all employees understand their roles and responsibilities in maintaining cybersecurity.
Maintain ongoing monitoring and reporting: Ongoing monitoring and reporting can help agencies quickly detect and respond to security incidents and provide regular updates on the status of their information systems.
Stay up-to-date on new threats and vulnerabilities: Keeping up-to-date on new threats and vulnerabilities can help agencies proactively address potential risks to their information systems.
By following these best practices, federal agencies can help to ensure successful compliance with FISMA and FedRAMP, as well as maintain strong cybersecurity practices overall.
5 Types of Organizations that can Benefit from FedRAMP Compliance
Discover the DataBank Difference today:
Hybrid infrastructure solutions with boundless edge reach and a human touch.