Tell us about your infrastructure requirements and how to reach you, and one of team members will be in touch shortly.
Let us know which data center you'd like to visit and how to reach you, and one of team members will be in touch shortly.
Tell us about your infrastructure requirements and how to reach you, and one of team members will be in touch shortly.
Let us know which data center you'd like to visit and how to reach you, and one of team members will be in touch shortly.
Both cloud and bare metal solutions are widely used in financial services. Each environment does, however, bring its own benefits, challenges, and regulatory concerns. With that in mind, here is a straightforward guide to cloud for financial services and bare metal finance solutions.
Here are the three main benefits of cloud for financial services.
Cloud solutions provide financial institutions with unmatched scalability, allowing them to adjust resources based on demand. Whether it’s processing transactions during peak times or running complex analytics, the cloud can dynamically allocate resources to meet these needs without requiring physical infrastructure changes.
By leveraging cloud services, financial institutions can reduce the capital expenditure associated with maintaining and upgrading physical hardware. Cloud providers offer consumption-based pricing so firms only pay for what they use. Additionally, using the cloud minimizes the need for on-premises IT staff, as maintenance and updates are handled by the provider, further reducing operational costs.
Cloud platforms often provide pre-built frameworks and tools, which speed up development cycles and allow financial services firms to bring innovations to market faster than competitors. They also often enable financial institutions to experiment with new technologies without significant upfront investments.
Here are the three main challenges of cloud for financial services.
While cloud providers invest heavily in security, the shared nature of cloud environments can raise concerns over data privacy and security. Financial institutions handle sensitive customer data and must ensure that this data is protected from unauthorized access. For example, they will need to implement robust encryption, access controls, and continuous monitoring.
Cloud providers may not always offer the transparency needed to verify compliance, leading to potential regulatory risks. Financial institutions must carefully evaluate cloud providers to ensure they meet all necessary regulatory standards.
Adopting a cloud platform often ties financial institutions to a particular vendor’s ecosystem, making it difficult to switch providers or migrate back to on-premises solutions without significant cost and effort.
Here are the three main benefits of bare metal finance solutions.
Bare metal servers offer superior performance compared to virtualized environments because they run directly on the hardware without an intervening hypervisor. This is crucial for high-frequency trading (HFT) and other latency-sensitive applications in the financial industry.
With bare metal, financial institutions have complete control over their hardware, including the ability to implement customized security measures. This control reduces the attack surface and allows for more stringent security protocols than those typically available in shared cloud environments. Bare metal solutions also avoid the risks associated with multi-tenant environments, where vulnerabilities in one tenant could potentially affect others.
Bare metal servers are highly reliable and can be optimized for specific financial applications, ensuring that critical operations remain uninterrupted. By customizing the hardware configuration, institutions can maximize uptime and minimize the risk of hardware failures impacting their operations.
Here are the three main challenges of bare metal finance solutions.
Deploying bare metal infrastructure requires significant capital investment in physical hardware, networking equipment, and data center space. Unlike cloud solutions, which spread costs over time, bare metal requires financial institutions to bear the full cost upfront.
Scaling a bare metal environment involves purchasing and physically installing additional hardware, which can be time-consuming and expensive. This lack of agility contrasts with the ease of scaling cloud resources, making bare metal less suitable for rapidly changing business needs.
Managing bare metal infrastructure involves significant operational complexity, including hardware maintenance, software updates, and network management. Financial institutions must maintain a skilled IT team to handle these tasks, which can divert resources from more strategic initiatives.
Here are the three main regulatory considerations for cloud and bare metal in financial services.
Cloud providers often operate data centers in multiple countries, making it essential for financial firms to ensure that their data remains within approved jurisdictions to meet regulatory requirements. Bare metal solutions, housed in specific locations, may offer clearer compliance paths but require careful planning to ensure adherence to data sovereignty laws.
Cloud environments can complicate this process due to the shared responsibility model and potential lack of visibility into the underlying infrastructure. Bare metal solutions offer more straightforward auditing processes, as institutions maintain full control over their hardware and software, providing clear and direct access to logs and records.
Both cloud and bare metal solutions must be carefully managed to balance the need for innovation with strict regulatory compliance. Financial institutions must develop robust governance frameworks that allow them to leverage the latest technologies while remaining compliant with all applicable laws and regulations.
Discover the DataBank Difference today:
Hybrid infrastructure solutions with boundless edge reach and a human touch.